Posts tagged reader
Naive
Your awesome Tagline
Look what I found: two amazing charts
[shared via Google Reader from Junk Charts]
While doing some research for my statistics blog, I came across a beauty by Lane Kenworthy from almost a year ago (link) via this post by John Schmitt (link).
How embarrassing is the cost effectiveness of U.S. health care spending?
When a chart is executed well, no further words are necessary.
I’d only add that the other countries depicted are “wealthy nations”.
***
Even more impressive is this next chart, which plots the evolution of cost effectiveness over time. An important point to note is that the U.S. started out in 1970 similar to the other nations.
Let’s appreciate this beauty:
- Let the data speak for itself. Time goes from bottom left to upper right. As more money is spent, life expectancy goes up. However, the slope of the line is much smaller for the US than the other countries. There is no need to add colors, data labels, interactivity, animation, etc.
- Recognize what’s important, what’s not. The US line is in a different color, much thicker and properly made the foreground of the chart.
- Rather than clutter up the chart, the other 19 lines are anonymized. They all have the same color and thickness, and all given one aggregate label. This is an example of overcoming loss aversion (see this post for more): it is ok to suppress some of the data.
- The axis labeling is superb. Tufte preaches this clean style. There is no need to use regularly-spaced axis labels… use data-informed labels. Unfortunately, software is way behind on this issue. You can do this in R but that’s about it.
Google's problem is that it now believes itself above others
[shared via Google Reader from OSNews]
“It’s never the offence; it’s the cover-up. And if there’s one thing that the last few years have taught us, it’s that the suggestion of a ‘rogue’ worker having acted alone to do something which led to an intrusion is never correct. There has to be a failure of management oversight as well. That’s why Google is in such hot water now over the revelations contained in the Federal Communications Commission report into what went wrong with its Street View Wi-Fi data collection program.” What a total and utter surprise: company does bad stuff, tries to cover it up. Sometimes I think I’m the only person in the world who grasps that companies - they are not to be trusted. This really isn’t rocket science, people.Apple, Dropbox, our PC-free future and our sweet solution past
[shared via Google Reader from TUAW - The Unofficial Apple Weblog]
A few days ago in the Dropbox forums, a developer said Apple had rejected his app due to a little quirk, so to speak, in using Dropbox. Specifically, if a user doesn’t have the Dropbox app installed, a link to a web page would be issued, causing the user to go to Dropbox’s website or a mobile version which would allow them to log in. That’s not the problem. The problem was that this web page contained a link that could eventually lead to a user establishing an account with Dropbox or even (gasp!) paying them for storage.
Problem is, you can’t do that without Apple getting a cut. Apple has rules about subscriptions, you see, and by allowing a (supposedly new) user to create an account that could be paid monthly, the developer in question was in violation of the App Store guidelines. Naturally, other developers have come forward either with similarly rejected apps or suggestions to Dropbox with changes that might help.
The Verge reports that Dropbox has confirmed Apple IS rejecting apps which allow users to buy a Dropbox subscription. Except Dropbox has taken the step to remove any and all links to the “desktop version” of their site, which effectively blocks anyone using an app that would behave in such a way from actually purchasing the Dropbox account. It would appear they’ve made it impossible to create an account entirely once you are in an app using the latest version of the Dropbox SDK, which developers should be doing.
Recently Apple made a big deal about a “PC-free” era, touting the power and simplicity of the iPad as a reasonable PC substitute. My kids use iPod touches as their own mini-computers. It makes sense, doesn’t it? Until you run into something like this Dropbox issue, which I have little doubt will be resolved soon. The problem is that the solution, as it looks now, isn’t very user-friendly. That is, if you value choice.
But there’s this notion that Apple doesn’t like choice, remember? Conspiracy theorists have already said this is Apple trying to push iCloud over Dropbox. I can’t argue that Apple will always prefer a native solution to any problem (that’s their way), but I would never argue that they arbitrarily make life difficult for users in a rush for profits. Besides, iCloud isn’t making them money yet, it’s just a value-add to their hardware business.
The fact is we have a sweet solution that Apple intended all along: the open Web. As long as web browsers are still allowed on iOS, developers have that as a fallback. I was enthralled today to read about Blackline, and other magazines who are retreating from “apps” and moving back to the web, where standards and cross-platform compatibility were always the cornerstones of development. Frankly, we could use more web apps and fewer native apps.
Nevertheless, I think this stinks for users. I can see confusion over setting up an account, as an app will dump them into a web page within their app, but if they don’t have a Dropbox account, they’ll have to go to Safari itself and establish one. Rules are rules, but this isn’t elegant. Dropbox, for its part, has said it will try to work with Apple for a better solution. Here’s hoping.
Apple, Dropbox, our PC-free future and our sweet solution past originally appeared on TUAW - The Unofficial Apple Weblog on Wed, 02 May 2012 01:15:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.
When pricing your body parts, please consult this handy infographic [Holy Crap Wtf]
[shared via Google Reader from io9]
